January 23, 2012

#AntiSec - Strarfor emails Teaser 3 OCCUPY MOVEMENT first part

_ _ __ .__
__| || |_______ _____/ |_|__| ______ ____ ____
\ __ /\__ \ / \ __\ |/ ___// __ \_/ ___\
| || | / __ \| | \ | | |\___ \\ ___/\ \___
/_ ~~ _\(____ /___| /__| |__/____ >\___ >\___ >
|_||_| \/ \/ \/ \/ \/


.____ .__ ____ ___
| | __ __| | ________\ \/ / _____ _____ ______
| | | | \ | \___ / \ / / \\__ \ / ___/
| |___| | / |__/ / / \| Y Y \/ __ \_\___ \
|_______ \____/|____/_____ \/___/\ \__|_| (____ /____ >
\/ \/ \_/ \/ \/ \/
.___.__ __ .__
____ __| _/|__|/ |_|__| ____ ____
_/ __ \ / __ | | \ __\ |/ _ \ / \
\ ___// /_/ | | || | | ( <_> ) | \
\___ >____ | |__||__| |__|\____/|___| /
\/ \/ \/

Episode #...something. Stratfor eats Cocks: lurking emails.

for oncoming #AntiSec Updates on Stratfor mails and other
candiez: @AnonymouSabu @AnonymousIRC


1. An unmeasurable amount of awesomenimity something can produce.


Well hope you all enjoyed that first teaser ---> http://pastebin.com/YwazdGRZ
and second one ---> http://pastebin.com/EFVXcq0f
>.< So here we go...again with more srs shit now cause internets is srs business. TITLE: STRATFOR TAKES ON OCCUPY WALLSTREET MOVEMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: brian.genchur@stratfor.com To: jacob.shapiro@stratfor.com To: opcenter@stratfor.com Subject: Re: Dispatch tomorrow? Date: 2011-10-17 03:56:39 Content: 10-4 Brian On Oct 16, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Jacob Shapiro wrote: i'm not sure about this -- let's talk in the morning On 10/16/11 8:13 PM, Brian Genchur wrote: I like this. Any additional thoughts? Brian On Oct 16, 2011, at 6:21 PM, scott stewart wrote: I guess we could also take a more tactical slant. I've seen people talking about how this "new movement" is a terrible threat to corporations, but in reality, due to the history of anarchists, animal rights, anti-war and anti-globalization protesters, companies are well prepared for such hippy hijinks. On 10/16/11 7:10 PM, "scott stewart" wrote: Is it worth talking about how the occupy wallstreet people are really just retreads from the anarchist movement in the late 1990's early 2000's? It also showed a little bit in the code pink anti war movement in the mid 200s. So it is not a completely new phenomenon, it is just an older phenomenon that is once again regaining strength. On 10/16/11 2:57 PM, "Brian Genchur" wrote: Are there any ideas for a good Dispatch topic for tomorrow? Will need a thesis and bullets sent to list before tomorrow. Thank you! Brian Genchur Sent from iPhone -- Jacob Shapiro STRATFOR Director, Operations Center cell: 404.234.9739 office: 512.279.9489 e-mail: jacob.shapiro@stratfor.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > trick or t(h)reat!
> lol


> deep penetration resistance
> trollolol
> XD


From: stewart@stratfor.com

To: alpha@stratfor.com

List Name: mailto:alpha@stratfor.com

Subject: Re: [alpha] INSIGHT-US-Occupy Austin and Deep Green Resistance-NO CODE

Date: 2011-11-17 14:01:00


It might sound strange, but some of the most radical deep ecology people
actually believe that there are too many people on the earth and that
radical steps must be taken to reduce the population and save the earth.
This strain of deep ecology is a clear reflection of the way the movement
was heavily influenced by people like Martin Heidegger who were also
committed to Nazism. Yes, Nazis were radical environmentalists.....
From: Marc Lanthemann
Organization: STRATFOR
Reply-To: Alpha List
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:08:31 -0600
To: Alpha List
Subject: Re: [alpha] INSIGHT-US-Occupy Austin and Deep Green Resistance-NO
Jesus I spent a couple of hours researching these guys - weird is an
understatement. Apparently they met yesterday a couple of blocks away from
my house to consolidate their leadership, go through basic indoctrination
and plan more events. As far as I can tell, the Austin chapter is not
nearly as radical as the central Lierre Keith DGR whose website is a
treasure trove of incitment to passive resistance, blowing up energy
infra, basic counter intel and legal guidance.

Their ideology seems to be a mix of hardcore environmentalism, anarchism,
radical feminism and the general notion that we need to go back living
sustainably like the american indians by blowing up every pipeline and
cell tower on the planet. Unlike the central DGR, Austin DGR doesn't seem
to have defined targets and goals (their meeting yesterday was a
brainstorming session on what radical environmentalism means in Austin).

just a few nice quotes from their central website:

The task of an activist is not to navigate systems of oppressive power
with as much personal integrity as possible; it is to dismantle those

What would we do if Nazis had invaded, and they were vacuuming the oceans,
scalping native forests, damming every river, changing the climate, and
putting carcinogens into every mother's breast milk, and into the flesh of
your children, your lover, your mother, into your own flesh? How much
worse would the damage have to get? Would you resist? If there existed a
resistance movement, would you join it?

On 11/16/11 7:42 PM, Victoria Allen wrote:

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T


From: Korena Zucha
Sender: alpha-bounces@stratfor.com
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:38:01 -0600
To: Alpha List
ReplyTo: Alpha List
Cc: Anya Alfano
Subject: [alpha] INSIGHT-US-Occupy Austin and Deep Green Resistance-NO
New source so don't yet have code or rankings. Source is a Texas DPS

There is a group you may be familiar with called Deep Green Resistance.
They are led by (among a number of people) a eco-radical named Lierre
Keith. She co-wrote the book, Deep Green Resistance: Strategy to Save
the Planet. Very enlightening if you haven't read it. The movement
advocates the collapse of industrial civilization to reach their eco
goals. In the book, they advocate the use of guerrilla tactics to defeat
current institutions when it comes to the environment. Whether anyone in
the Fed or elsewhere classifies this group as eco-terror or not, I don't
know, but they are nothing but and should be watched.


The local Austin chapter was part of the Occupy Austin crowd at city
hall, however, things were not "radical" enough for them since they do
not believe in working within the system. When I was working U/C on Nov.
5th, some of my contacts told me that at the General Assembly on Nov.
4th, there was some conflict between regular Occupy people and Deep
Green. Deep Green picked up all their stuff and left during the night.
As best as anyone knows, they left and went to a state park off 71. The
only place I know is McKinney Falls out in that area. They have started
a group called the "Phoenix Commune" and intend to make their base out
there, living off the land, so to speak. My source says they told him
that as long as they move 10' everyday, the park officials can't make
them leave. These Deep Green people worry me. When my Occupy people
refer to them as "stupid, crazy motherfuckers", that bothers me, because
these Occupy people will tolerate just about anything.

I passed the info on to locals and since the park is way outside the
complex, I haven't done any follow up other than to keep an eye and ear
open for anything they may plan for the complex.

Early on in the Occupy movement, they got the group to support some
document called, "Indigenous Struggle Solidarity Statement" calling
Austin an occupied territory. It includes a picture of armed native


So, to make a long story short, I think the eco-terror group is focused
on creating a situation where violent confrontation will be the ultimate

Marc Lanthemann
Watch Officer
+1 609-865-5782




> eco-terror?
> whats its carbon footprint? its supposedly lower than usual terror, isnt it?
> is that like a low budget paranormal activity movie? :3

No comments:

Post a Comment